Review Capacity Lab
Find the review queue your team can actually absorb.
Compare incoming work with protected human review hours. Change the assumptions to see where unfinished work accumulates.
Worked examples. All values are illustrative.
Your assumptions
One work class.Demand and capacity
Per workday.- Review demand
- 16 h192 reviewed cases per workday.
- Protected team capacity
- 8 h2 reviewers × 4 hours.
- Demand / capacity
- 200%Offered load, not actual utilization.
- Backlog after 10 workdays
- 80 h960 review-case equivalents.
This review needs more than one reviewer's protected workday. Pooled capacity does not schedule indivisible cases.
At your chosen target
80% of protected capacity.- Maximum new intake
- Reviewers for new intake
- Reviewers to clear starting backlog too
- Average effort per reviewed case
New-intake figures exclude existing backlog. Backlog staffing spreads its workload across your selected window.
Unfinished review work
Deterministic daily totals.Show daily values
| Workday | New demand (h) | Completed work (h) | Queue at end (h) | Case equivalents |
|---|
How the model works
Use one work class whose reviewers can substitute for one another. Rates and effort are converted using the work calendar above.
- Convert request rates to requests per workday, and active review effort to minutes.
- Minutes per reviewed case = first-review minutes + extra-pass fraction × extra-pass minutes.
- Review demand = requests × review fraction × minutes per reviewed case.
- Team capacity = qualified reviewers × protected hours × 60 minutes.
- Tomorrow's queue = maximum of zero and today's queue + new demand − capacity.
- Maximum intake = chosen target × capacity ÷ review workload per incoming request.
- Reviewer counts round up. Backlog-clearing staffing includes starting queue workload divided by modeled workdays.
Case equivalents divide remaining work by average review time. They can be fractional; real approvals remain whole decisions.
At exact capacity, an empty queue stays empty in this model. Any starting backlog remains, with no room for interruptions.
This model pools effort. It does not schedule individual cases. A long review assigned to one person cannot finish sooner merely because other people have spare hours.
This model omits within-day bursts, reviewer scheduling, fatigue, skill differences, and repeated returns. It estimates remaining workload, not actual waiting times, case completion dates, or decision quality. Staffing figures describe pooled capacity. A target below 100% is an assumption to investigate, not evidence that a workflow is safe.